Here are 10 significant judgments from the Supreme Court and High Courts of India between 2004 and 2014 concerning Article 13 of the Constitution of India, along with their significance:
I.R. Coelho vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2007): This landmark judgment reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine and held that any laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973, are subject to judicial review, ensuring they do not infringe upon fundamental rights.
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. Union of India (2011): This case addressed the issue of passive euthanasia, emphasizing the need for laws to respect the fundamental rights under Article 21, which relate to life and personal liberty.
Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust vs. Union of India (2014): The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, ensuring that it aligns with fundamental rights under Article 13.
Naz Foundation vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2009): This case decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults, ensuring that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code did not infringe upon fundamental rights, although later re-criminalized until 2018.
People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) vs. Union of India (2013): The Supreme Court ruled that citizens have the right to reject all candidates contesting an election, ensuring that laws align with the democratic principles and fundamental rights under Article 13.
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India (2013): This judgment struck down Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which allowed convicted legislators to continue in office while their appeals were pending, ensuring that the law did not infringe upon the principle of equality.
R. Gandhi vs. Union of India (2010): This case addressed the constitutionality of the National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal, ensuring that the laws establishing these bodies did not infringe upon judicial independence and fundamental rights under Article 13.
Namita Sharma vs. Union of India (2013): The Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of the appointments of Information Commissioners under the Right to Information Act, ensuring the process was transparent and did not infringe upon fundamental rights.
NALSAR University vs. Union of India (2008): This case dealt with the constitutional validity of laws relating to higher education and autonomy of educational institutions, ensuring that laws aligned with the principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Novartis AG vs. Union of India (2013): This landmark patent case upheld the rejection of a patent for a pharmaceutical product, emphasizing that laws should balance innovation incentives with public health considerations and must align with fundamental rights.
National Legal Services Authority vs. Union of India (2014): This landmark case recognized the rights of transgender individuals as a third gender and directed the government to provide them with reservations in education and employment. The Supreme Court held that any law violating the fundamental rights of transgender individuals would be void under Article 13.
Nandini Sundar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2011): The Supreme Court declared the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers unconstitutional and directed their immediate disbandment. The judgment emphasized that laws promoting vigilante justice violate fundamental rights.
Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. State of Kerala (2014): Known as the Sabarimala case, this judgment dealt with the entry of women of reproductive age into the Sabarimala temple. The court stressed that any custom or law infringing on women's fundamental rights would be void under Article 13.
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India (2013): This judgment struck down Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which allowed convicted legislators to continue in office while their appeals were pending. The judgment ensured that laws infringing upon the principle of equality would be void under Article 13.
In Re: Noise Pollution (2005): The Supreme Court issued guidelines to control noise pollution, emphasizing that laws infringing upon the right to a healthy environment would be void under Article 13.
Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015): This landmark judgment struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which criminalized offensive online content. The court held that the provision was vague and violated the right to freedom of speech and expression.
Om Kumar vs. Union of India (2001): The Supreme Court elaborated on the doctrine of proportionality, emphasizing that administrative actions must not infringe upon fundamental rights unless necessary and justified.
State of Maharashtra vs. Indian Hotel and Restaurants Association (2013): The Supreme Court struck down a law banning dance bars, stating that it violated fundamental rights to practice any profession or carry out any occupation, trade, or business.
Novartis AG vs. Union of India (2013): This case dealt with the patenting of pharmaceutical products, emphasizing that laws should balance innovation incentives with public health considerations and must align with fundamental rights.
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. Union of India (2011): This case addressed the issue of passive euthanasia, emphasizing the need for laws to respect the fundamental rights under Article 21, which relate to life and personal liberty.
These cases highlight the judiciary's role in interpreting and upholding fundamental rights under Article 13 during this period.
No comments:
Post a Comment